ºìÐÓÊÓƵ

Topic

Exploring the Intersection of Weight and Disability Stigma in Canada: An Intersectionality-Informed Approach

Department of Educational Psychology and Leadership Studies

Date & location

• Thursday, April 10, 2025
• 10:00 A.M.
• Clearihue Building,Room B007

Examining Committee

Supervisory Committee

• Dr. Sarah Nutter, Department of Educational Psychology and Leadership Studies, University of Victoria (Supervisor)
• Dr. Jon Woodend, Department of Educational Psychology and Leadership Studies, UVic (Member)

External Examiner

• Dr. Lyndze Harvey, Department of Curriculum and Instruction, University of Victoria

Chair of Oral Examination

• Dr. Sarah Macoun, Department of Psychology, UVic

Abstract

Weight stigma is a pervasive social justice issue negatively affecting the physical and mental health of higher weight individuals across various contexts, including healthcare, education, and the workplace. Similarly, disability stigma entails dehumanizing attitudes and discriminatory practices directed at disabled individuals, leading to social exclusion and reduced quality of life. When intersecting, these stigmas may compound, amplifying negative health outcomes and marginalization. This research explored how the intersection of weight and disability stigma uniquely impacts higher weight individuals identifying as disabled, using an intersectionality-informed approach to illuminate the experiences of marginalized communities that are often overlooked in Canadian stigma research. Enhanced Critical Incident Technique methodology was utilized to explore stigmatizing incidents, their impact, and participants’ wish list items for navigating stigma. Participants (n = 191) described experiencing weight and disability stigma across their lifespan and in various social environments, with profound mental health consequences such as internalized stigma, emotional distress, and social withdrawal. Furthermore, systemic barriers such as inaccessible environments and weight-centric healthcare approaches intensified participants’ feelings of societal exclusion. Despite these challenges, participants identified social support and advocacy as critical foundations for resilience and recovery. Participants highlighted accessible environments, bias training for healthcare providers, and holistic care models as crucial wish list items to reduce stigma and promote inclusive practices. By examining how weight and disability stigma intersect, this study provides actionable insights to inform future research and stigma-reduction advocacy. Future research should continue to address these intersecting stigmas to dismantle barriers and create inclusive environments across Canadian society.